@Adam_Steinmark It looks a lot like people’s prints back when they used skeinforge. Where someone mucked around with line widths, etc to get it looking right, but missed some basic thing.
@Ondrej_Kollar1 , there are a few facts to printing that will make your life a lot easier. Rule #1: Make sure youre X, Y, Z, and E steps-per-mm are properly set. Afterwards, make sure your nozzle size, filament diameter, and extrusion multiplier are all properly set. Don’t muck with a bunch of other stuff until you get almost a perfect print out of the basics. Then you can dive into the advanced settings and change other things. Most defaults, are sane, and you shouldn’t need to mess with line spacing or any other advanced settings just to get a proper print out. If things look weird with almost bone-stock settings out of slic3r – then look for a hardware issue. You want to treat this like any other CNC machine, assume that the software is doing its job, and fix the problem at its source. Don’t rely on hacks in software to fix problems with hardware.
@ThantiK a lot of those symptoms are congruent with oozing too. When I accidentally print no-name PLA (needs ~200C) with my maker pla settings (~230C) I see a very similar result.
To be fair I’ve never over extruded (that I know of) so the differences aren’t that apparent to me. But if reducing the flow doesn’t fix this I hope the OP seriously considers dropping the nozzle temp.
@Jared_Eldredge then we are already two. Looks like overtemp for me too. It is the corner where it stay a little bit longer and it just oozes out there.
Hi, retraction in my setting only change strings nothing more. I have now recalibrated E step and waiting on result with temp: 190 … 6 min to finish, then I post result here as image.
So here is result after today’s experimentation. In short. I made special model with two walls with angle 51, 2 mm thin and after a lot of changes I found that main problem was realy only with TEMP. Now is test model printed with extruder temp at 190. I think that result is perfect now.
How in the world? No joke, I’m surprised as hell to hear that you upped your e-steps value and came out with that result. Meh. Calibration is calibration! Glad that lowering temp helped come out with a better result!
but i have to say, that now has model exact same size as was modeled. 2x2x2 cm + 0.05 - 0.1 mm. With previous setup was diff about 0.4 mm. But it was maybe due to was print at temp. 205.
