Really? I assume it must require something specific otherwise why bother with a non-canonical fork?
E.g if a status request (?) Reports back something not there in 0.9 or 1.1 then that’s a major change that must have a rationale!
Yeah i don’t know either. From the start i expected that they would the latest firmware. But apperently not.
But i fully tested it just know and i can say that the full chain works now. And if I may add, it did even a damn good job. I’m very pleased with te result.
So what ever they have done it works. But if i believe you, they guys that know this stuff, they are not fully following the official grbl guidelines.
How odd. Gobsmacked in fact.
Correct. This is non canonical if your report of the result from a ? Is correct.
Grbl also made significant changes between 0.9 and 1.1 branch. The 1.0 branch was not released as a stable branch.