CroSSboW v3.0 … is this a good print.?
very impressive.
Print settings?
The experts think too much in theory and don’t try “bad” ideas. Ive used this method for years. Print looks good!
Brook
Mmm… what print controller and LCD is that? Looks like the printer does some really nice prints too.
Awesome print.
Great Job! thank goodness you didn’t give up after many people dismissed the design. There are many solutions to a given problem, I believe in always trying the non-“Theoretically Best” ideas because that can lead down a path less traveled and is where you can make breakthroughs.
Agree!
So… all starts with openbuilds parts… then we realized are not good enough so we make all custom but keep the compatibility with openbuilds parts, so if someone want to build one just use their parts. LCD and the main board come from Makerbase team. https://github.com/makerbase-mks. Very very good stuff. In that print we use glass PLA, Simplify3D gcode generated at 70m/s, 0,20 layer (0.4 nuzzle), 210°C head. 50°C bed.
“”“Simplify3D gcode generated at 70m/s, 0,20 layer (0.4 nuzzle), 210°C head. 50°C bed.”""
That is the fastest printer I have ever seen. I mean 70m/s, how do you keep that machine together and is it made out of unobtainium?
sorry… 70mm/s
@Ciprian_Balalau_Make I was just kidding. Would be nice though if 3D printing could do 70m/s.
Why experts say this is not good design. According to the theory this should produce one of the best available designs according to the accuracy. This comes by simple reason. Accuracy of the machines is combined value of the accuracy of every axis. Disconnecting fastest moving axis from each other on theory will increase the accuracy as Z axis is pretty passive during the print. Also the biggest weakness of this design (the momentum generated in X axis) makes this design unusable in CNC milling but in printing should be ignored with well constructed machine. The only downsides of this design are the need of big enclosure and accelerate the printing part.
Very nice print results 
@George_Novtekov
But this is obviously only your (limited) theory. And it ignores a lot of other aspects. Which is basically the reason why you think it is right 
a