While I fiddle about with the FSR coding, I’ve loaded a previous version of the firmware to play with make’s Torture test.
I see from comments that using support for the arch is pretty common, so that’s one deviation from as-printed when you see these lovely examples online.
So what constitutes a successful print of the torture test? removing a raft? trimming strings? I see lovely examples on thingiverse but wonder just how much post processing goes on before the picture’s taken.
It’s similar to the claims that Makerbot’s press photos of sample prints have a lot of post processing done to them that casually doesn’t get mentioned in the pics. (Professional Driver: Closed Course. )
I agree with you, especially if the arch test is made to evaluate the ability of the printer to deal with overhang; but if support is used the test itself is useless and only made to show a “good” quality that is not “pure”. In other case the post processing can be good to show which type of final product can be made with a 3D printer in general, so can be more “accepted” or “acceptable”.
How’s the FSR stuff coming by the way? jcrocholl has a branch with all the software changes needed already - have you checked the branch out and hooked up your FSRs yet?
Fsr’s connected, transferred the setting from the erikmalm firmware to the Johann firmware…and something’s very not right. It homes, it jogs, the end stops act sane, but requesting g0 has all three motors attempting to go higher, despite the end stops being lit.
)