Here’s a design study of a tool changer based on the old HP pen plotters. They didn’t seem to need an extra motion control of any kind to pick or stow a pen on the carousel. I had never had an opportunity to dismantle one to see how they work, so a bit of Googling led me to the HP online museum where a user’s manual showed me enough of the mechanism to figure it out. The gist of it is this: Spring-loaded fingers on either the carriage or the carousel grip the tool. During a transfer, the carriage is forced against the carousel, and the empty side fingers force the other fingers off of the tool, gripping it in turn. Every time the carriage and carousel come together, the tool is transferred from one side to the other.
I adapted that concept to an E3D V5 Bowden hot-end. The hot end is gripped on a modified fan shroud, instead of by the groovemount. In my models, the green side is the carriage, and the purple side is the station in the tool magazine (if the wiper wasn’t a dead giveaway). Clearly a lot of detail is missing, such as screws, and springs in the obvious places. I only put enough effort into the design to see if it pans out.
The tool-changer’s advantage is the lowest possible moving mass for multiple tools. Lower mass allows higher acceleration, which tends to allow higher quality or speed. The tool changer also allows the opportunity to design for large numbers of tools, including things that aren’t extruders. Things like digitizing probes, swivel-knives, pens, and maybe small machining spindles.
The primary disadvantage is complexity. A printer with a single travelling beam (H-bot, CoreXY, etc.) can give up about 55 mm of travel on one side of the machine to mount a row of tool stations. So no other controls need to be added than are necessary for the tools themselves. Anything else will need to be able to move a magazine of tool stations into position for the carriage to pick tools from.
Whether it’s worth the trouble is not an easy question to answer. The carriage-side parts are about half the mass of a 2nd E3D V5. The Kraken appears to be amazingly mass-efficient for 4 extruders. I think it will still add significantly more moving mass than this tool-changing carriage, but I don’t have good enough numbers for the Kraken’s mass to be sure the tool-changer complexity is worthwhile. It does seem obvious that the simplicity of the Kraken makes it an obvious choice as the development platform for multi-extruder printers.
I think something like this will become necessary in the pursuit of utmost speed, but for now, I think I’ll need to be content with mounting a 2nd V5.
Images and some models files in the Drive folder linked below.
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B9O8yNL4GMNTTDM4SjY4aTl3djQ&usp=sharing