Uhmmm… Doesn’t a cube by definition have six identical sides? So to be consistent with, well, math, shouldn’t the “cube” module in the demo code be called “cuboid”?
It’s the little things that make a good product a great one - personally I would never think of passing a “cube” module three dimensions.
Still lots of work to do before it can be considered “ok” by my standards
@Simon_Day
It is good to hear that it works on a mobile device. I plan to add more mobile compatible controls in the future too;)
@Thomas_Sanladerer
duly noted, and while that is a bit nitpicky about some not-even-alpha-yet code , I have to agree (hence “rectangle” and not “square” for the 2d shapes in the latest screens)
@Mark_Moissette_ckaos sorry 'but that.
Btw, i too tested on my phone, a Galaxy Nexus - even though layout got shuffled around a bit, it was fully functional as far as i could tell.