Loving the Replicape and Kamikaze 2.0.8! I have 99% of a working configuration and need a little guidance on using the delta bed leveling macro.
Currently using the example for G29 (below). The printer goes through the motions and properly triggers the zprobe. What it doesn’t do for me is raise the probe between points and sets a smaller probe radius. My probe hangs down too low to use 100% of radius. How do I raise the probe between points? is there away to set the bed probe radius?
I attached my local.cfg it is for a Kickstarter Delta by Billy Zelsnack the Polygon 2060. Printer is awesome btw 
g29 =
M557 P0 X0 Y100 Z25 ; Set probe points
M557 P1 X86.6 Y50 Z25
M557 P2 X86.6 Y-50 Z25
M557 P3 X0 Y-100 Z25
M557 P4 X-86.6 Y-50 Z25
M557 P5 X-86.6 Y50 Z25
M557 P6 X0 Y0 Z25
G28 ; Home steppers
G30 P6 S
G30 P6 S
G30 P0 S
G30 P0 S
G30 P1 S
G30 P1 S
G30 P2 S
G30 P2 S
G30 P3 S
G30 P3 S
G30 P4 S
G30 P4 S
G30 P5 S
G30 P5 S
G30 P6 S
G30 P6 S
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/polygon-delta-3d-printer/fK2mrQNbBEo
Hi! Love the enthusiasm! Did you try the “G29C” G-code? It is a special G-code to generate a G29 macro. Try “G29C?” to get a description of the alternatives for the command!
doh! didn’t even process that command properly… thanks!
I ran the setup G29C and did get a better radius. For some reason my printer thinks it is a slope though 
http://review.thing-printer.com/?key=RPA52HF3IHS6K1TL3AJ1
in Smoothie i had
Arm length is 270.
Arm radius is 145.75
I measured the Hez at 65.31
I put in my config
hez = 0.06531
l = 0.27
r = 0.14575
and it produces the sloped results, any suggestions on what could be off? did I not convert the radius correctly? ie smoothie radius does not equal replicape radius?
here is what the G29C produced (when run it doesn’t hit half the bed of course)
g29 = M561; (RFS) Reset bed matrix
M557 P0 X+50.00 Y+0.00 Z30.0
M557 P1 X+35.36 Y+35.36 Z30.0
M557 P2 X+0.00 Y+50.00 Z30.0
M557 P3 X-35.36 Y+35.36 Z30.0
M557 P4 X-50.00 Y+0.00 Z30.0
M557 P5 X-35.36 Y-35.36 Z30.0
M557 P6 X-0.00 Y-50.00 Z30.0
M557 P7 X+35.36 Y-35.36 Z30.0
M557 P8 X+37.50 Y+0.00 Z30.0
M557 P9 X+26.52 Y+26.52 Z30.0
M557 P10 X+0.00 Y+37.50 Z30.0
M557 P11 X-26.52 Y+26.52 Z30.0
M557 P12 X-37.50 Y+0.00 Z30.0
M557 P13 X-26.52 Y-26.52 Z30.0
M557 P14 X-0.00 Y-37.50 Z30.0
M557 P15 X+26.52 Y-26.52 Z30.0
M557 P16 X+25.00 Y+0.00 Z30.0
M557 P17 X+17.68 Y+17.68 Z30.0
M557 P18 X+0.00 Y+25.00 Z30.0
M557 P19 X-17.68 Y+17.68 Z30.0
M557 P20 X-25.00 Y+0.00 Z30.0
M557 P21 X-17.68 Y-17.68 Z30.0
M557 P22 X-0.00 Y-25.00 Z30.0
M557 P23 X+17.68 Y-17.68 Z30.0
M557 P24 X+12.50 Y+0.00 Z30.0
M557 P25 X+8.84 Y+8.84 Z30.0
M557 P26 X+0.00 Y+12.50 Z30.0
M557 P27 X-8.84 Y+8.84 Z30.0
M557 P28 X-12.50 Y+0.00 Z30.0
M557 P29 X-8.84 Y-8.84 Z30.0
M557 P30 X-0.00 Y-12.50 Z30.0
M557 P31 X+8.84 Y-8.84 Z30.0
M557 P32 X+0.00 Y+0.00 Z30.0
G32 ; Undock probe
G28 ; Home steppers
G30 P0 S F3000; Probe point 0
G30 P1 S F3000; Probe point 1
G30 P2 S F3000; Probe point 2
G30 P3 S F3000; Probe point 3
G30 P4 S F3000; Probe point 4
G30 P5 S F3000; Probe point 5
G30 P6 S F3000; Probe point 6
G30 P7 S F3000; Probe point 7
G30 P8 S F3000; Probe point 8
G30 P9 S F3000; Probe point 9
G30 P10 S F3000; Probe point 10
G30 P11 S F3000; Probe point 11
G30 P12 S F3000; Probe point 12
G30 P13 S F3000; Probe point 13
G30 P14 S F3000; Probe point 14
G30 P15 S F3000; Probe point 15
G30 P16 S F3000; Probe point 16
G30 P17 S F3000; Probe point 17
G30 P18 S F3000; Probe point 18
G30 P19 S F3000; Probe point 19
G30 P20 S F3000; Probe point 20
G30 P21 S F3000; Probe point 21
G30 P22 S F3000; Probe point 22
G30 P23 S F3000; Probe point 23
G30 P24 S F3000; Probe point 24
G30 P25 S F3000; Probe point 25
G30 P26 S F3000; Probe point 26
G30 P27 S F3000; Probe point 27
G30 P28 S F3000; Probe point 28
G30 P29 S F3000; Probe point 29
G30 P30 S F3000; Probe point 30
G30 P31 S F3000; Probe point 31
G30 P32 S F3000; Probe point 32
G31 ; Dock probe
M561 U; (RFS) Update the matrix based on probe data
M561 S; Show the current matrix
M500; (RFS) Save data
Thanks!
Jim
http://review.thing-printer.com/?key=RPA52HF3IHS6K1TL3AJ1
What I did is I ignored the hez factor and subtracted it from the Delta radius, works better, I think there’s a bug left in that piece of code