Now this is a machine. 5-axis, open source toolchain to give back to the maker community. The design for the 4-th and 5-th axis allows for large movement volume and quick and easy tool head change. I like the design quite a bit.
One criticism. Their first goal is to add extra tools. Their second is to add usable multi axis software. I believe the software is of greater importance than extra tools.
Spending $1000-$1500 on a machine with interchangeable tools and having to add that again to have workable software doesn’t make sense to me.
There is also the possibility I completely misunderstood and their stretch goal is for more efficient multi axis software than they will initially ship with.
Perhaps there are existing software that you can already use to generate 5 axis gcode. If that is the case, the pledges should take care of providing you with a machine.
Would you prefer a multi purpose machine with little or no software, or, a single purpose machine with functional software?
I want to reiterate. I may have misunderstood the video explanation and this whole conversation is merely academic.
I think the kickstarter aims to get the machine off the ground. 5-axis is still non existent in most open source builds. The fact that the tool head is interchangeable is an added factor.
I’d be tempted to create a minimal 5-d CAM package if machines like that fell below 2,000 USD (and stayed there). The compute engine for it wouldn’t be in the browser though.