You may not know this, but when you upload something to Thingiverse, Thingiverse owns it. They can modify, distribute and even sell your model, without credit or acknowledgment, regardless of the license you specified. See section 2.5 and 3.2 here
In that light, is there a good alternative to Thingiverse ?
(IANAL)
Actually, those Terms Of Use clearly state that you retain ownership of your design.
You are, however, granting Thingiverse a full license to use your designs in pretty much any way they see fit, with the limitation clause, “solely for the purposes of including your User Content in the Site and Services”.
It seems pretty reasonable, considering the free service they are providing.
Those TOS have been fuel for discussion a couple times already. Legally speaking, you will never lose the ownership to your designs and like @Jasper_Janssen said, you need to grant them this limited license to run the site.
If you’re worried about thingiverse, you should check out the TOS of Facebook or Google Plus - they’re even less restricted and would allow e.g. Facebook to sell copies of your images (while the Thingiverse TOS would not).
Section 2.5 only refers to the site and not user content.
There are other companies making and selling stuff I’ve designed that was downloaded from thingiverse, but this is because of the type of license I applied. So the thingiverse terms are not really an issue to me.
Thingiverse is a good site, well made, fast, and is pretty much the ideal platform to showcase my stuff. Thingiverse provides a good service.
https://www.youmagine.com/ is made by Ultimaker. Unlike Makerbot we’re doing our best to open up and work with our users. We’re already talking about github intergration and are improving fast because of ideas from the users.
We’re also working on open API’s to allow everything from website to desktop or phone app access the information. While the API documentation hasn’t been released yet, some of the implementation can already be found in the Cura sources.
I don’t think that’s what they say. They don’t “own” it, they get certain user rights - that’s not the same. And you can determine how others can use and download your design (e.g. creative commons). Not as bad as you claim, but then again, this is a tricky and complex area.
The real tragedy (to me) of the whole legal freak out that happened a while back was the disappearance of designs from thingiverse. Some because the owner didn’t want their design’s ownership compromised, some out of protest. Both because it was clear they didn’t understand the licensing. I don’t fault MakerBot for the language in the TOS. They’re obligated to have it to protect themselves. Sooner or later someone will get upset that MakerBot featured their design, or something else equally banal, and there will be a legal question. MakerBot addressed this in a blog post, but it’s clear that people don’t understand the legalise.
Ok that must be a new thing this is why I see users with Idol accounts. Good thing I donot put things on thingy-verse I only use the Stuff others where stupid enough to post on there no wonder why I got the Gears from people when I posted a Pic of my Persa Mendel and I will not post when I have made a thing… they are waiting to start charging people or Sueing people for Reproducing there work.